Seth is interested in Cervelo frames, the RS the R3 and also the Z4 from Parlee. These are all great frames so we don't mind having a good look at them and giving him our thoughts. He also wants to know how headset spacers affect the frames handling and geometry
Question: Are there merits to the new Cervelo RS, does adding spacers to a headset detune the geometry of a racing frame? I am debating between the Cervelo RS, R3 and the Parlee Z4.
Hi Seth,
You have a good eye for a top frame and we like the offerings from Cervelo, the R3 is a very strong and hardwearing frame that was originally designed and built for the CSC Team to win the Classic race, Paris-Roubaix. As Cervelo say "the R3 is bulletproof" this is shown by their riders Fabian Cancellara and Stuart O'Grady winning the hardest of races back to back, the R3 was the lightest bike ridden by the heaviest rider in Paris-Roubaix. The R3 is also light and perfect for up hill and long Grand Fondo rides, basically it suits many different terrains, its super light and comfortable and stiff.
R3 to RS Comparison
The RS is a slightly up dated version of the R3, it has the same handling properties, the same seat stay set up with their deflection mode, multi shaped tube design and lots of carbon at the bottom bracket and head tube areas, they are both astoundingly stiff and light and both have Kevlar to strengthen important stress areas. So what's the difference? The main difference between the two frames is the longer head tube lengths, Cervelo claim that the handling philosophy is the same as their other bikes, but the longer head tubes available are for those riders who prefer a higher handle bar position. Also the Extra Small has been redesigned so as to eliminate toe overlap with the front wheel. So it's a geometry thing in the end.