Joe Incardona has taken a fancy to either the R3, the RS from Cervelo or the Ghisallo from Lightspeed. This comes down to Carbon verses Titanium which we have looked at many times before. He has also listed his component choice, so we discuss that too
Question: I am an avid recreational roadie. I am interested in choosing between two frames for my next bike build.
I am comparing the Cervelo R3 or RS to a 2008 Lightspeed Ghisallo frame.
I will outfit the frame with carbon tubulars, durace gruppo, FSA compact carbon crank, FSA carbon cockpit, Alpha Q GS10 fork.
I love both frames and am leaning towards the Ghisallo. The Ghisallo is approximately 600-800 more. Why go TI over Cervelo carbon?
Hi Joe,
You ask "Why go Ti over Cervelo carbon?" Well, we don't think you should. Titanium is a nice material for bike building, its light and will last a life time, but the draw backs out weight its advantages. Many people who I have talked to who own or have owned Titanium frame all say the same, its comfortable, but feels soft and a bit dead. This is great for long rides or on rough surfaces as the frame will take the shocks. The disadvantage with this is that you don't get a stiff, solid performance, unlike the ride you get from Carbon. Some say that a carbon frame gives a harsh ride, this maybe true, but it gives you the performance you want from an expensive bike.