<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chain Rings, How Many Teeth Do You Have?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/chainrings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/chainrings.html</link>
	<description>Perhaps the Best Hub on Cycling Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:25:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/chainrings.html#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/?p=3339#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>I have a set of FSA cranks on my Cervelo Soloist and they are a 130mm, 5 arm, 53/39T combination. I cant find a 53T on line to buy so can I run a 52/39 or 54/39 so long as they&#039;re still 130mm, 5 arm config? In other words, does a 53T have to run with a 39 or can you choose any combination?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a set of FSA cranks on my Cervelo Soloist and they are a 130mm, 5 arm, 53/39T combination. I cant find a 53T on line to buy so can I run a 52/39 or 54/39 so long as they&#8217;re still 130mm, 5 arm config? In other words, does a 53T have to run with a 39 or can you choose any combination?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/chainrings.html#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/?p=3339#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>I ride a 50/36, but they are Rotor rings so it is a little different from regular rings.  I also go with a 11-23 cassette to keep things nice and tight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ride a 50/36, but they are Rotor rings so it is a little different from regular rings.  I also go with a 11-23 cassette to keep things nice and tight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALLAN HAFEMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/chainrings.html#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>ALLAN HAFEMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/?p=3339#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Hi,I would like to obtain some lower gears for hills. I have a 42/53set. Would a compact 36/50 or a lower gear rear cassette be the best change?Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,I would like to obtain some lower gears for hills. I have a 42/53set. Would a compact 36/50 or a lower gear rear cassette be the best change?Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 28/51 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: images.bikecyclingreviews.com

Served from: www.bikecyclingreviews.com @ 2012-02-08 00:01:04 -->
