<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cervelo R3 or Specialized Tarmac Pro SL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cervelo-r3-or-specialized-tarmac-pro-sl.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cervelo-r3-or-specialized-tarmac-pro-sl.html</link>
	<description>Perhaps the Best Hub on Cycling Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:25:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cervelo-r3-or-specialized-tarmac-pro-sl.html#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/?p=5545#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the responses. I went with the Specialized Tarmac Pro SL (red/white) since the team I was on got a special deal through Specialized. It was a no brainer then. 

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the responses. I went with the Specialized Tarmac Pro SL (red/white) since the team I was on got a special deal through Specialized. It was a no brainer then. </p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cervelo-r3-or-specialized-tarmac-pro-sl.html#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/?p=5545#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan

Maybe a bit late now, but I&#039;m a tall guy 6&#039;3, 205 pounds.  I ride the Specialized Tarmac Pro SL 58cm with full SRAM Red.  Being tall and strong I can&#039;t find anything to fault with the big; it&#039;s stiff, responsive, looks great, perfect for sprints and no problems on the 100km plus rides comfort wise.  I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan</p>
<p>Maybe a bit late now, but I&#8217;m a tall guy 6&#8217;3, 205 pounds.  I ride the Specialized Tarmac Pro SL 58cm with full SRAM Red.  Being tall and strong I can&#8217;t find anything to fault with the big; it&#8217;s stiff, responsive, looks great, perfect for sprints and no problems on the 100km plus rides comfort wise.  I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cervelo-r3-or-specialized-tarmac-pro-sl.html#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/?p=5545#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Oh poor me, poor me....just kidding.  I haven&#039;t ridden either of those bikes. I do own a Spec. Roubiax though and love it.
Test ride them both and have fun picking one. I bet they&#039;re both great so it&#039;s a win-win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh poor me, poor me&#8230;.just kidding.  I haven&#8217;t ridden either of those bikes. I do own a Spec. Roubiax though and love it.<br />
Test ride them both and have fun picking one. I bet they&#8217;re both great so it&#8217;s a win-win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 32/53 queries in 0.052 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: images.bikecyclingreviews.com

Served from: www.bikecyclingreviews.com @ 2012-02-09 01:45:17 -->
