<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cassette Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cassette-change.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cassette-change.html</link>
	<description>Perhaps the Best Hub on Cycling Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Derk</title>
		<link>http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/cassette-change.html/comment-page-1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Derk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bikecyclingreviews.com/?p=5222#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I changed to a new casette, bit more low gears than yours and found that an Ultegra derailleur worked better as well as the chain being properly fitted so you didn&#039;t lose the chain if you hit the smallest front and smallest back or lock up if you hit the largest of each. If you are running a compact crank there is much less of a problem to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I changed to a new casette, bit more low gears than yours and found that an Ultegra derailleur worked better as well as the chain being properly fitted so you didn&#8217;t lose the chain if you hit the smallest front and smallest back or lock up if you hit the largest of each. If you are running a compact crank there is much less of a problem to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
